Google Scholar: citations
Diagnostic classification of irritability and oppositionality in youth : a global field study comparing ICD-11 with ICD-10 and DSM-5
Evans, Spencer C. (Harvard University)
Roberts, Michael C. (University of Kansas)
Keeley, Jared W. (Virginia Commonwealth University)
Rebello, Tahilia J. (Columbia University)
de la Peña, Francisco (Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (Mèxic))
Lochman, John E. (University of Alabama)
Burke, Jeffrey D. (University of Connecticut)
Fite, Paula J. (University of Kansas)
Ezpeleta, Lourdes (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)
Matthys, Walter (Utrecht University)
Youngstrom, Eric A. (University of North Carolina)
Matsumoto, Chihiro (Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology)
Andrews, Howard F. (Columbia University Medical Center)
Medina-Mora, María Elena (Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (Mèxic))
Ayuso-Mateos, José L. (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid)
Khoury, Brigitte (American University of Beirut Medical Center)
Kulygina, Mayya (Alekseev Mental Health Clinic (Rússia))
Robles, Rebeca (Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (Mèxic))
Sharan, Pratap (All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Nova Delhi, Índia))
Zhao, Min (Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine)
Reed, Geoffrey M. (World Health Organization (Suïssa))

Date: 2021
Abstract: Background. Severe irritability has become an important topic in child and adolescent mental health. Based on the available evidence and on public health considerations, WHO classified chronic irritability within oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) in ICD-11, a solution markedly different from DSM-5's (i. e. the new childhood mood diagnosis, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder [DMDD]) and from ICD-10's (i. e. ODD as one of several conduct disorders without attention to irritability). In this study, we tested the accuracy with which a global, multilingual, multidisciplinary sample of clinicians were able to use the ICD-11 classification of chronic irritability and oppositionality as compared to the ICD-10 and DSM-5 approaches. Methods. Clinicians (N = 196) from 48 countries participated in an Internet-based field study in English, Spanish, or Japanese and were randomized to review and use one of the three diagnostic systems. Through experimental manipulation of validated clinical vignettes, we evaluated how well clinicians in each condition could identify chronic irritability versus nonirritable oppositionality, episodic bipolar disorder, dysthymic depression, and normative irritability. Results. Compared to ICD-10 and DSM-5, ICD-11 led to more accurate identification of severe irritability and better differentiation from boundary presentations. Participants using DSM-5 largely failed to apply the DMDD diagnosis when it was appropriate, and they more often applied psychopathological diagnoses to developmentally normative irritability. Conclusions. The formulation of irritability and oppositionality put forth in ICD-11 shows evidence of clinical utility, supporting accurate diagnosis. Global mental health clinicians can readily identify ODD both with and without chronic irritability.
Rights: Tots els drets reservats.
Language: Anglès
Document: Article ; recerca ; Versió acceptada per publicar
Subject: International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) ; Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) ; Mood dysregulation ; Irritability ; Child and adolescent mental health
Published in: Journal of child psychology and psychiatry and allied disciplines, Vol. 62 Núm. 3 (2021) , p. 303-312, ISSN 0021-9630

DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13244
PMID: 32396664


Post-print
24 p, 305.8 KB

The record appears in these collections:
Research literature > UAB research groups literature > Research Centres and Groups (research output) > Health sciences and biosciences > Research group Epidemiology and Diagnosis in Psychopathology of Development (UED)
Articles > Research articles
Articles > Published articles

 Record created 2023-10-30, last modified 2024-02-15



   Favorit i Compartir